Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in excerpt
Search in comments
Filter by Custom Post Type

A New Essay by Ernest Partridge

For what reason Should We Trust the Scientists?

Striking Quotable

Sweep the racks of a bookshop or an open library and you will see that the vast majority of the books are about the transient worries of today… They underestimate so much, entirely overlooking how hard won was the logical information that gave us the agreeable and safe lives we appreciate. We are so unmindful of the certainties whereupon science and our logical culture are built up that we give rise to put on our bookshelves to the drivel of crystal gazing, creationism, and garbage science. At first, they were there to engage, or to enjoy our interest, and we didn't consider them important. . Presently they are time after time acknowledged as truth.

James Lovelock

Science, 8 May, 2000

Back to Homepage of

Ernest Partridge

NEW: Why Should We Trust the Scientists? For what reason should we give more trustworthiness to the finish of 97% of thousands of atmosphere researchers, than we provide for Sen. Inhof's snowball or the Heartland Institute's misconceptions? What's more, for what reason would it be a good idea for us to trust advancement instead of Genesis? Isn't advancement “only a hypothesis”? Is there any valid reason why we shouldn't respect science a “simply one more creed? That is the directing inquiry of this article.

Repeat: On the Morality of Science. The substance of science is without esteem. In any case, as an action, science is saturated with assessment, for the procedure that yields these “esteem free” explanations, requires an order and a responsibility that to merits the name of “profound quality.” Thus the progression of science is portrayed by conduct that must be depicted as “righteous,” and the defilement of science as good shortcoming.

Bernard Weiner:

James Comey Visits his Shrink. James Comey is an enthusiastic wreck as he attempts to manage the political snakepit that is the FBI nowadays: an expert Trump group connected with a progressively moderate group in a war of pre-race spills. Come needs assistance. In his specialist, the Bureau executive at long last has someone he can vent to.

Repeat: Germany In 1933: The Easy Slide Into Fascism This paper, composed when the CheneyBush organization was running roughshod over the Constitution, is as yet important today as our homegrown neo-fundamentalists have entered the political standard. Trump makes George W. appear to be a polite moderate. The parallels to the ascent of one party rule in 1930 Europe, obviously, are not correct, but rather appear to be frightfully familiar.(First posted June 9, 2003)

1 Stern2 Sterne3 Sterne4 Sterne5 Sterne (183 Ratings. Average: 4.68 von 5)